Chapter 07Artifacts and Resources3 min read

Practical artifacts (copy and adapt)

What you’ll learn

Four copy-able artifacts a hiring loop runs on: the recruiter intake template, the master screening rubric, a stage-by-stage red-flag checklist, and LinkedIn Boolean strings for sourcing.

Artifact 1. Recruiter intake call template

With Hiring Manager, 30 minutes.

Recruiter intake call: FDE search

With Hiring Manager · 30 minutes

1. Trigger
   What triggered this opening? Who's doing this work today? What happens if we don't fill it?

2. Day-in-life
   Walk me through what week 4 looks like. Hour by hour.

3. Customer
   Who is the customer? Are they technical? Where does the FDE physically sit?

4. Build vs. implement balance
   What % of their time is writing production code merged into mainline vs. configuration vs. customer meetings? If <30% writing merged code, it's not actually an FDE; it's a Solutions Architect or Implementation Lead.

5. Success metric
   How will we know in 6 months this hire was great? What number, artifact, or customer outcome?

6. Anti-profile
   Who would crush a FAANG SWE loop but fail in this seat?

7. Comp band + level
   Specific.

Artifact 2. Master screening rubric

Used across the loop. Score 1–4 on each dimension.

DimensionWeightSource round
Customer fluency / empathyHighRecruiter, HM, Customer Sim
Grit / radical ownershipHighHM, Values, References
Problem decompositionCriticalOnsite, Decomposition
Product senseHighHM, Decomposition
Technical depth (production)HighTechnical screen, System design
AI tool proficiencyCriticalTechnical screen + AI probe
Communication clarityHighEvery round
Scope discipline / saying noMediumCustomer sim
CoachabilityMediumReferences

Artifact 3. Red-flag checklist

Use during loop debriefs.

Red-flag checklist by stage

Use during loop debriefs

Resume:
• Only enterprise titles, no shipped artifacts.
• Buzzword-stuffed JD descriptions.
• 10+ years FAANG-only.
• Refuses GitHub or AI-augmented work samples.

Recruiter screen:
• Can't articulate why FDE specifically.
• Refers to all AI as "ChatGPT".
• Passive voice ("the team shipped …").
• No customer-facing experience or aspiration.

Technical screen:
• Can't explain code AI just produced.
• Pastes whole codebase into context.
• No plan before coding.
• Behavioral signals of stealth AI overlays.
• Defensive when asked to narrate.

Customer simulation:
• Solves before scoping.
• Blames customer's systems.
• Promises timelines without diagnosis.
• Cracks under polite escalation.

References:
• Manager declines to comment on customer-facing work.
• 'Would hire back' only for a lower role.
• Cross-functional partner unavailable.

Artifact 4. LinkedIn Boolean strings

Run as saved searches; rerun weekly.

Direct-title catch + adjacent (broad)

LinkedIn Boolean: direct + adjacent

Use as a saved search

("Forward Deployed Engineer" OR "Forward Deployed Software Engineer" OR FDSE OR "Applied AI Engineer" OR "Deployment Strategist" OR "Customer Engineer" OR "Solutions Architect" OR "Solutions Engineer" OR "Solutions Architect II" OR (Python OR TypeScript OR Go) AND (LLM OR Claude OR GPT OR Anthropic OR OpenAI OR Cursor OR Palantir OR Anduril)) AND ("San Francisco" OR "New York" OR "London")

Founding engineer pool (highest conviction)

LinkedIn Boolean: founding engineers

Filter to Series A / B + AI infra mentions

("Founding Engineer" OR "Founding Software Engineer" OR "Employee #" OR "First engineer" OR "Engineer #1" OR "Engineer #2" OR "Engineer #3") AND (YC OR "Y Combinator" OR "Series A" OR "Series B") AND ("data extraction" OR "data ingestion" OR "agent infrastructure" OR (Cursor OR Anthropic OR enterprise OR deployment OR onboarding))

Key takeaways

  • The intake call is where searches succeed or fail. Articulate the archetype in one sentence before writing a JD.
  • Score 1–4 on each rubric dimension; hire bar is ≥3 average, no 1s, ≥3 on the four critical dimensions.
  • Run the Boolean strings as saved searches and rerun weekly. Sourcing is a habit, not a project.